Imagine a compliance platform costs you $12,000 per year. Is that expensive?
It all depends on the item you’re replacing.
Automating the gathering of evidence across a complex technology system eliminates hundreds of hours of tedious work then $12,000 is a well-spent amount of money. If a seven person startup could have similar evidence in just the space of a few hours every month, the amount differs.
It’s an effective method to begin your look for Vanta. Asking which platform has the best features is not the only thing to consider. Consider how much time and effort those features will save your company.
Automation is an economic break-even Point
Automation of compliance isn’t always good or bad. Its value varies with the size. Imagine an expanding technology company with multiple cloud environments as well as multiple applications. Manually collecting evidence could be a major operational burden. Integrations that automate monitoring systems and collect evidence easily justify their cost.
Now consider a 10-person startup making preparations for its first SOC 2. Imagine a startup with 10 employees who are preparing for their first SOC 2.
Vanta pricing is based upon this difference. Although a sophisticated platform may offer many capabilities However, they’re only beneficial when the organization is required by the company.
Compare Architecture Not Just Brands
A search for Vanta or Drata will quickly turn into an exercise in feature-by-feature. The two platforms are built on automation and integrated companies that are looking to adopt this kind of solution can benefit by comparing the frameworks supported with their integrations, service as well as individual quotes and contracts.
You’ll have to decide on something else first. Do you think your business is ready for an integration-driven compliance system at all? Some businesses want automated evidence collection and constant monitoring. Others prefer to produce evidence on their own, particularly when workload is modest.
Vanta Competitors aren’t all following the same model
Many well-known Vanta competitors compete within a similar automation-focused category. It also offers more lightweight platforms that focus on the organization of systems rather than a large amount of connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of the latter category. CertAssist was developed by internal auditors and compliance experts. It combines framework controls into a single workspace that offers editable guidelines on policies as well as evidence. Auditors can review the evidence through a restricted interface.
It doesn’t set up agents or connect to the infrastructure system. Customers upload their own proof.
Factor System Access to the Decision
It is apparent that removing integrations will have a disadvantage. One must gather evidence by hand.
It also removes the need for integration setup and means the compliance application does not require constant connection to the organisation’s operational environment.
The architectures of either are not superior to each other. It is essential to consider what tradeoffs are appropriate for your business.
CertAssist is geared towards teams comprising between five and 200 people and publishes its pricing instead of requiring an initial sales call to determine the starting figure. The price for its launch is $225 per month as opposed to the regular cost of $375 per month.
Let Complexity Earn Its Place
The requirements of a 10 person business today will not necessarily be its requirements at 100 or 500 employees.
Compliance can be maintained with the help of a basic platform. As the number of employees, systems, frameworks and evidence requirements increase, the economy could ultimately favor more automation. Let complexity take its place when it comes to purchasing compliance technology.
Don’t pay for fifty integrations just because they look impressive on a comparison chart. They’re worth it when doing the tasks they are replacing is more costly as compared to manually performing them.